{"id":1849,"date":"2008-04-11T13:33:42","date_gmt":"2008-04-11T13:33:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.geoffreylong.com\/wordpress\/?p=1849"},"modified":"2008-04-11T13:33:42","modified_gmt":"2008-04-11T13:33:42","slug":"video-the-flickring-image","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.geoffreylong.com\/wordpress\/archives\/1849","title":{"rendered":"Video: the Flickring Image"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Something is afoot in the land of online imagery.<br \/>\nMy Twitter account has come to serve as the CNN crawler to my RSS feeds&#8217; feature stories and interviews: little bits and snippets of news with tinyurl pointers to the latest events.  As I scrolled through my account this morning, I saw that at 5:31 PM yesterday, Derek Powazek tweeted &#8220;Are you resistant to change? Join the EVERYTHING NEW IS BAD army! <a href=\"http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/groups\/changeresistance\/\">http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/groups\/changeresistance\/<\/a>&#8220;, which was my first clue that something was up.  I thought Derek was just being snarky, so I didn&#8217;t take the bait &#8212; but at 5:57, Matt Howie followed suit with &#8220;Man, just when you think nothing can top Livejournal user drama, Flickr &#8220;no video&#8221; people go and redefine the term &#8216;user drama'&#8221;.  The topic died down for a while (evidence that my circle, now in our mid-twenties to mid-thirties, are getting more interested in things like cooking and kids than teh Intarwebs in the evenings), but then at 1:01 AM EST my photographer friend Rannie Turingan tweeted &#8220;What do you think of Video on Flickr? <a href=\"http:\/\/tinyurl.com\/5qdqqw\">http:\/\/tinyurl.com\/5qdqqw<\/a>&#8220;.  Molly Wright Steenson&#8217;s tweet &#8220;all your base are belong to Flickr Video&#8221; was the next on the topic at 11:07, followed by my &#8220;Holy crap Flickr Video&#8221; at 11:15 and Kevin Smokler&#8217;s &#8220;Flickr video kicked my kitten&#8230;&#8221; at 11:24.  Right now the blogosphere is discovering something new and, like a bunch of curious kittens (thanks, Kevin) we&#8217;re poking it, prodding it and figuring out what we think of it.<br \/>\nA lot of the reaction so far has been negative, as Derek&#8217;s tweet seems to have foreshadowed.  (This isn&#8217;t surprising; Derek&#8217;s wife Heather Champ Powazek works at Flickr, so both Derek and Heather are sitting at ground zero for this one &#8212; in fact, Heather posted a video on the official Flickr blog called <a href=\" http:\/\/blog.flickr.net\/en\/2008\/04\/08\/video-on-flickr\/\">&#8216;Video on Flickr&#8217;<\/a> that served as an official teaser for the feature on April 8.)  Ryan Gantz posted an interesting Obama-meets-Anti-Flickr-Video mash-up image titled <a href=\"http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/sixfoot6\/2404582236\/\">&#8216;leave flickr alone&#8217;<\/a>, which is only one image in the pools <a href=\"http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/groups\/no_video_on_flickr\/pool\/\">We Say NO to Videos on Flickr<\/a> (25,239 members), <a href=\"ttp:\/\/www.flickr.com\/groups\/no_video\/pool\/\">NO VIDEO ON FLICKR!!!<\/a> (10,544 members) and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/groups\/no_videos_on_flickr_uncensored\/pool\/\">We say NO to Videos on Flickr UNCENSORED!<\/a> (27 members).  It&#8217;s the last one that&#8217;s particularly interesting; aside from the fact that yes, you do have to click through Flickr&#8217;s safety screen to get to it (Flickr&#8217;s CYA clause for NSFW images), it&#8217;s the only one of the three to have a number of <i>actual videos<\/i> appearing on its initial page.  In fact, six of the thirty images on the pool&#8217;s initial page point to videos, all of whom seem to be illustrating the point that &#150; shocker! &#150; adding video to Flickr opens the door to <strong><em>questionable content<\/strong><\/em>.  Actually clicking on them, though, shows that the content isn&#8217;t that questionable &#150; the first one, a short video called &#8216;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/claudiaveja\/2404007727\/in\/pool-no_videos_on_flickr_uncensored\">Genesis in Reverse<\/a>&#8216; by a user called Claudia Veja is straight out of art school, featuring what appears to be a naked woman wandering through a city, but the film is shot in such a way that it shows no &#8216;questionable&#8217; body parts aside from some ankle and some collarbone.  The second, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/upyerbum\/2357683202\/in\/pool-no_videos_on_flickr_uncensored\">Easter Photowalk 2008<\/a>&#8216; by &hearts;&nbsp;shhexycorin&nbsp;&hearts;, is a hyperaccelerated autobio piece with the most questionable bit being a guy trying to kick a pigeon or two.  PETA might be annoyed, but they&#8217;d be hard pressed to file charges.  The third, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/claudiaveja\/2404298002\/in\/pool-no_videos_on_flickr_uncensored\">Genesis in reverse part 2<\/a>&#8216;, also by Claudia Veja, is a continuation of the first that is somewhat sexier (featuring a risque outfit, a cigarette and, later, some cross-gendered makeup) but still isn&#8217;t what I&#8217;d deem NSFW.  The others?  A <a href=\"http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/juicyfruit412\/2401460518\/in\/pool-no_videos_on_flickr_uncensored\">dog getting peanut butter off his nose<\/a>, a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/8047442@N06\/2402519520\/in\/pool-no_videos_on_flickr_uncensored\">cat drinking from a toilet<\/a> and a dog named Gilligan <a href=\"http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/blogdog\/2402533224\/in\/pool-no_videos_on_flickr_uncensored\">running at double-speed around a yard<\/a>.<br \/>\nTitillating stuff, that.  So what&#8217;s going on here?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Something is afoot in the land of online imagery. My Twitter account has come to serve as the CNN crawler to my RSS feeds&#8217; feature stories and interviews: little bits and snippets of news with tinyurl pointers to the latest events. As I scrolled through my account this morning, I saw that at 5:31 PM [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[61,66,67],"tags":[96,101,102],"class_list":["post-1849","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-geoffrey-long","category-online-video","category-user-generated-content","tag-geoffrey-long","tag-online-video","tag-user-generated-content"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p4e5QR-tP","_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.geoffreylong.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1849","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.geoffreylong.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.geoffreylong.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.geoffreylong.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.geoffreylong.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1849"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.geoffreylong.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1849\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.geoffreylong.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1849"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.geoffreylong.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1849"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.geoffreylong.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1849"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}